SRX does not support persistent-nat for IPV6. At least not on version 11.4xxxx . I have read several posts about using the ipv4 persistency, for IPV6. natv6v4 seems one way. Can I use just that statement? I don't want to apply any groups for reasons of stability. There aren't many choices and it doesn't seem entirely correct to leave out ipv6 header fragmenting. That might defeat the purpose. I still am left with wanting to use the last option however. That option manipulates the header framentation. Comments and replies are welcome.
Do future releases of junos support persistent nat for IPV6, solely?
eugene73,
B S.C.M. Engineering Graduate.
Construction, ITT Tech Alumni
A.A.S. Drafting, Design, ITT Tech.
Do future releases of junos support persistent nat for IPV6, solely?
eugene73,
B S.C.M. Engineering Graduate.
Construction, ITT Tech Alumni
A.A.S. Drafting, Design, ITT Tech.